Asia as Method

Asia as Method

Kuan-Hsing Chen

出版时间

2010-04-15

文件格式

PDF

文件大小

2.05MB

评分

★★★★★
内容简介

Centering his analysis in the dynamic forces of modern East Asian history, Kuan-Hsing Chen recasts cultural studies as a politically urgent global endeavor. He argues that the intellectual and subjective work of decolonization begun across East Asia after the Second World War was stalled by the cold war. At the same time, the work of deimperialization became impossible to imagine in imperial centers such as Japan and the United States. Chen contends that it is now necessary to resume those tasks, and that decolonization, deimperialization, and an intellectual undoing of the cold war must proceed simultaneously. Combining postcolonial studies, globalization studies, and the emerging field of “Asian studies in Asia,” he insists that those on both sides of the imperial divide must assess the conduct, motives, and consequences of imperial histories.

Chen is one of the most important intellectuals working in East Asia today; his writing has been influential in Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and chinese mainland for the past fifteen years. As a founding member of the Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Society and its journal, he has helped to initiate change in the dynamics and intellectual orientation of the region, building a network that has facilitated inter-Asian connections. Asia as Method encapsulates Chen’s vision and activities within the increasingly “inter-referencing” East Asian intellectual community and charts necessary new directions for cultural studies.

Kuan-Hsing Chen is a professor in the Institute for Social Research and Cultural Studies at Chiao Tung University in Taiwan. He has written and edited many books in Chinese. He is co-executive editor of the journal Inter-Asia Cultural Studies.

目录
Preface vi
Introduction: Globalization and Deimperialization 1
1. The Imperialist Eye: The Discourse of the Southward Advance and the Subimperial Imaginary 17
2. Decolonization: A Geocolonial Historical Materialism 65
3. De-Cold War: The Im/possibility of "Great Reconciliation" 115

显示全部
用户评论
Chap5; 在亚洲语境中进行inter-referencing的论点在今天看来还是很有意义的,但是看到最后又觉得好像所谓Asia as method不过也只是在provincialize Europe的基础上更进了一步?(中间political society和民间社会的类比挺有意思,尤其想想台湾那两百多个party...)
00年代才写得出来的书啊
有趣的是这本书的中文版的题目是:去帝国—亚洲作为一种方法,和四年后的英文版的主副正好是反过来的。因为编辑认为“亚洲作为一种方法”作为主标题更吸引全球的读者。”为什么是亚洲而不是别的“,可以激发更多疑问。这里的“方法”更像是一种动态的号召,让学者展开新视角审视亚洲,而不是静态的研究方法。书写和论述方式也很有启发,如何把社会事件和不同地域文化的学者的理论放在一起讨论,台湾本土左派还是很厉害的。
昨天午飯談起這本書,說到陳光興最近身體不好。還記得幾年前在AAA遇到他,直接批評我不看魯迅,硬給我發了好幾本書,走的時候說,我們還會見面的。是一個挺可怕也可愛的大叔。
重要文化研究/亚洲研究文本. 没想到他认识martin jacques以及他们家在台北的经历. 但是考虑到martin Jacques 2010年后的的成书. de-cold war, de-colonial, deimperialization 依然任重道远…
基于1960年代竹内好提出的理论做了新的阐释和研究,重要性不言而喻
Ch5 a s m
难得看到一本英文原著不如其中译版的,陈光兴在中文版里更放得开,有很多动人的闲言碎语和喋喋不休
结合新冠三年思考Asia as method还挺有意思
手机扫码访问
下载地址
我要反馈