Philosophy of Mind

Philosophy of Mind

Jaegwon Kim

出版时间

2010-12-28

文件格式

PDF

文件大小

1.56MB

评分

★★★★★
内容简介

The philosophy of mind has long been part of the core philosophy curriculum, and this book is the classic, comprehensive survey of the subject. Designed as an introduction to the field for upper-level undergraduates and graduate students, Philosophy of Mind focuses on the mind–body problem and related issues, some touching on the status of psychology and cognitive science. The third edition has been thoroughly updated throughout to reflect developments of the past decade, and it is the only text of its kind that provides a serious and respectful treatment of substance dualism. This edition also includes two new chapters on the nature of consciousness and the status of consciousness. Improved readability and clarity has been one important aim of the new edition. Throughout the text, author Jaegwon Kim allows readers to come to their own terms with the central problems of the mind. At the same time, Kim’s own emerging views are on display and serve to move the discussion forward. Comprehensive, clear, and fair, Philosophy of Mind is a model of philosophical exposition and a significant contribution to the field.

Jaegwon Kim is William Perry Faunce Professor of Philosophy at Brown University. He is the author of Supervenience and Mind; Mind in a Physical World; Physicalism, or Something Near Enough; Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind; and many important papers on the philosophy of mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of science.

用户评论
绝对的通俗好读全面啊。 但不乏某些偏见之处(比如在搞清楚Davidson的本体论之前不要下定论然后又忙着给人家找出路比较好吧...)。
It's good enough for background knowledge and Kim's writing is good, too.
呼。开始写论文。
心灵哲学读书班的教材。我读的唯一一本心灵哲学教材,所以也无从评价。只能说心灵哲学的主要理论都还介绍得挺清楚的?
兴味索然...有空再读吧。我只是感觉,借助当代分析哲学的努力和关切,以及在他们分享的一些比较标准的共识性理解的背景下,反过来再理解笛卡尔会是不错的思路。但只限于此了,我可能真不擅长analytic。当然,analytic作品的价值在于激发我们构造论证和模型解决问题、为自己辩护的兴趣和能力,但我连怎么进这个门也不会,sigh。
读第七章心灵因果性讨论。
当代顶级哲学家,太好读了
第四章里mental causation的例子不太对,书里的例子说"the pain(或者Cfs) that causes your hand to pull back in jerky motion and makes you cry 'Ouch!'"并不准确,缩手反射作为非条件反射只需要低级神经中枢参与,而疼痛/Cfs需要丘脑和大脑皮层,这是同一stimulus cause的两条反射路径,并且缩手反应要快于感到疼痛,并不能说pain/Cfs causes the pulling back of your hand. 但是Kim给出了两种解决办法不管是identity theory还是epiphenomalism(缩手反射和疼痛都是Cfs造成的)都错误地认为是Cfs或者疼痛造成的缩手反应。
下载地址
我要反馈