Justice as Fairness

Justice as Fairness

John Rawls

出版社

Belknap Press

出版时间

2001-05-15

文件格式

PDF

文件大小

12.23MB

评分

★★★★★
内容简介

This volume originated as lectures for a course on political philosophy that Rawls taught regularly at Harvard in the 1980s. In time the lectures became a restatement of his theory of justice as fairness, revised in light of his more recent papers and his treatise Political Liberalism (1993). John Rawls offers a broad overview of his main lines of thought and also explores specific issues never before addressed in any of his writings. Rawls is well aware that since the publication of "A Theory of Justice" in 1971, American society has moved farther away from the idea of justice as fairness. Yet his ideas retain their power and relevance to debates in a pluralistic society about the meaning and theoretical viability of liberalism. This book demonstrates that moral clarity can be achieved even when a collective commitment to justice is uncertain.

约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls,1921—2002),美国当代著名哲学家、伦理学家、政治学家、 哈佛大学教授。1921 年生于马里兰州,就学于普林斯顿大学,1950 年在该校获哲学博士学位,以后相继在普林斯顿大学(1950-1952),康奈尔大学(1953-1962),哈佛大学(1962-2002) 任教。罗尔斯自50年代起便潜心于社会正义问题的研究,《正义论》(1971) 是他集其论文之精粹并经过重新思考而形成的一部完整而一贯的理论著作。罗尔斯还出版了其它专著:《政治自由主义》 (1993), 《万民法》 (1999), 《道德哲学史讲演》 (2000)。 《正义论》已被誉为二战后政治哲学、伦理学领域中最重要的理论著作,将被列入历史经典名著之林。

用户评论
http://book.douban.com/review/5481637/ 韩乾这篇评论其实是走错了方向。【无知之幕】并不是从一种假定的契约理念去推导某一种确定的平等观,罗尔斯也没这个打算,因为他并不把【无知之幕】当做一个强论证,而是当做一个从属论证,一个论证策略罢了。因此批评【无知之幕】不具有心理上可能性或者从【无知之幕】中无法必然选择【差别原则】根本就不切题。因为不管怎么样,罗尔斯都会倾向于修改【原初地位】的表达来引导出人们必然选择【差别原则】,这看起来有点像耍无赖,错了,读书人的事怎么能叫耍无赖呢,罗尔斯称之为【反思的平衡(reflective equilibrium)】233333333
risk-aversion
这理说的,🐮👃。I should definitely look into a comparison of western and Chinese concepts of equality. “A conception of justice cannot be deduced from self-evident premises or conditions on principles; instead, its justification is a matter of the mutual support of many considerations, of everything fitting together into one coherent view.”
读的节选。论述非常清晰,但可能是刚读过福柯的缘故,感觉文风简直枯燥至极,翻两页就要打瞌睡……同学巴西小哥说,这一定是法国教授和美国教授的区别
读这本书身边常备一把屎,读十遍看不懂就吃一口
评分只针对写作风格,墨迹的句子特别多,行文格式长,晦涩,不简洁,
高中时读到这本书的感动与波澜,如今尽是失意。那些关于overlapping consensus/public reason的信念既真实又虚幻…可能还是要带着这些走很久很久
后半本没读完。读的时候感觉这写法真是太technical太枯燥了,但之后发现自己还是会时不时想起来里面的各种概念,才意识到自己受到它影响的程度可能比想象的大得多,还是有点厉害。
手机扫码访问
下载地址
我要反馈