Orientalism

Orientalism

Edward W. Said

出版社

Vintage

出版时间

1979-10-12

文件格式

EPUB

文件大小

2MB

评分

★★★★★
内容简介

Said is best known for describing and critiquing "Orientalism"; what he perceived as a constellation of false assumptions underlying Western attitudes toward the East.

In Orientalism (1978), Said decried the "subtle and persistent Eurocentric prejudice against Arabo-Islamic peoples and their culture". [1] He argued that a long tradition of false and romanticized images of Asia and the Middle East in Western culture had served as an implicit justification for Europe's and America's colonial and imperial ambitions.

Critiquing Said, Christopher Hitchens, who writes for Vanity Fair, wrote that he denied any possibility "that direct Western engagement in the region is legitimate" and that Said's analysis cast "every instance of European curiosity about the East [as] part of a grand design to exploit and remake what Westerners saw as a passive, rich, but ultimately contemptible 'Oriental' sphere". [2]

The British historian Bernard Lewis is another important critic who took issue with Said's work. The two authors exchanged a famous polemic in the pages of the New York Review of Books following the publication of Orientalism. Lewis' article, "The question of orientalism" was followed in the next issue by "Orientalism: an exchange".

Edward Wadie Said (إدوارد سعيد) (November 1, 1935 – September 24, 2003) was a well-known literary theorist, critic and outspoken Palestinian activist. According to Columbia News (Columbia University), he was "one of the most influential scholars in the world," and "was undoubtedly one of the greatest minds of the 20th century."

Said was born in Jerusalem (then in the British...

用户评论
萨义德忽略的一个部分在于“欧洲”=“历史进程中的主体和现代”不只是欧洲人的建构,也是第三世界的建构。不对称权力双方对权力结构的固化有同样的贡献。就像性别歧视不是男性对女性的压迫而是全性别共同促成的不平等一样,认为欧洲中心主义的主体只有欧洲事实上也是欧洲中心主义的一种表现。
Some distinctive objects are made by the mind,and these objects,while appearing to exist objectively,have only a fictional reality.东方永远只是欧洲人眼中的东方,而欧洲人的“东方”概念架构竟也随着殖民扩张渐渐内化到我们的无意识里,直至今天我们依然根深蒂固的认为我们所在的这片土地是东方。
很給力的噗通一聲響,但石子本身不怎樣。
上ART被迫读的啊,读的非常痛苦的呀。。。。。。
最精彩的是开篇两句quote,intro也雄伟壮阔,再往后就有点车轱辘话来回讲。虽然借用福柯知识/权力的那套理论,但还是把这两者的关系处理得太简单清晰了。大概就是要这种“大刀向敌人的头上砍去”的气势,才会引起这么轰动的效果吧。
花了整整三天讀完全書,真的會讓我懷疑自己的語言能力。明明在intro就寫清楚了的核心概念最終敷衍了三章,越到後來我越一頭霧水。Anyway,Said的理念還是很一針見血的。收穫頗多。
【借标】WeisseWeiblichkeiten: Konstruktionen von 'Rasse' und Geschlecht im deutschen Kolonialismus(AnetteDietrich):本书有两个主要论点:反驳殖民主义叙事对女性作用的边缘化、反对殖民史中对德国罪行的淡化。 其他:“种族主义”一词在德国的扁平化,德国一战前在亚非拉的殖民主义与二战时残害犹太人之间的联系;殖民主义下殖民者和被殖民者的权力关系;浪漫主义思潮下,“德意志民族”的想象与建构;“种族”与“民族”概念的竞争与相互成就等等。 最后,引用书中的一句话:“殖民史不应该仅仅被看作是男人们向外征服的历史(大意)。”。
The life of an Arab Palestinian in the West, particularly in America, is disheartening. There exists here an almost unanimous consensus that politically he does not exist, and when it is allowed that he does, it is either as a nuisance or as an Oriental. 一个巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人在西方——特别是美国——的生活是令人泄气的......在政治上他是不存在的;即使他获得了存在的权利,也是要么作为一个令人讨厌的累赘,要么作为一个“东方人”而存在。
萨伊德说 东方是西方人想象中的样子,而非真实的东方。有谁敢这么底气十足地说这句话,当然只有游走于美国、法国、巴勒斯坦的萨伊德敢说。旅行让我知道西方也分欧洲和美国,这两大西方体系内部充满着如何进行矛盾与冲突,甚至更甚于中西方冲突,而阿拉伯世界则代表另一种思考。有生之年,我将致力于成为萨伊德一样的写作者。
Orientalism, madness and civilization, 欧洲同性恋史, othering; dualism and boundaries. cyborg menifesto
手机扫码访问
下载地址
我要反馈